If you continue without changing your settings, we’ll assume you’re happy to receive all cookies from the BMA website. Find out more about cookies
When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms.
You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies are required
These cookies allow us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information we collect is anonymous unless you actively provide personal information to us.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies allow a website to remember choices you make (such as your user name, language or the region you're in) and tailor the website to provide enhanced features and content for you.
For example, they can be used to remember certain log-in details, changes you've made to text size, font and other parts of pages that you can customise. They may also be used to provide services you've asked for such as watching a video or commenting on a blog. These cookies may be used to ensure that all our services and communications are relevant to you. The information these cookies collect cannot track your browsing activity on other websites.
Without these cookies, a website cannot remember choices you've previously made or personalise your browsing experience meaning you would have to reset these for every visit. In addition, some functionality may not be available if this category is switched off.
Our websites sometimes integrate with other companies’ sites. For example, we integrate with social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, to make it easier for you to share what you have read. These sites place their own cookies on your browser as a result of us including their icons and ‘like’ or ‘share’ buttons on our sites.
Many of you will be aware that a national independent review of the gender pay gap in the medical profession has been launched. What you may not know is that the BMA’s advisory group, set up to bring a cross-BMA perspective to our participation in the gender pay gap review, contains male doctor representatives.
David Strain and I put ourselves forward from our respective committees [medical academic staff committee and consultants committee] to the BMA’s new group which is providing feedback on documents and proposals on the review.
I believe it’s absolutely critical that men have a strong voice in the review. This may seem obvious but to acknowledge this explicitly is still something of a taboo.
Why have I got involved? For three reasons.
The gender pay gap is a huge issue facing the medical profession. The gap manifests at all stages of careers, though it is much more acute by mid-career i.e. amongst SAS doctors and consultants. CEAs (clinical excellence awards) seem to have a part to play.
We know from national data that women are under-represented in CEA applications, although they have an almost identical success rate when they do apply. There are gender variations in local CEA awards being paid, which appears to be an artefact of the previous CEA scheme being tiered and points accrued being built on with subsequent awards.
In my trust, more women than men received awards in the last CEA round - things are changing. This is one of the areas we will be prioritising in the negotiations on the successor awards scheme to redress imbalances in award distribution which have grown over time.
However, CEAs are not the only factor in the gender pay gap. We know that early career choices often prompt a move into particular specialties, which vary in the amount of overtime, out of hours working required and therefore affect pay. Women are still much more likely to opt for specialties where female doctors are already well represented such as paediatrics and public health as opposed to more intensive, unpredictable specialties like emergency medicine, where women only make up 33 per cent.
Medicine is not always open to flexible working. Doctors often struggle to negotiate a reduction in their hours. Many working less than full-time miss out on training opportunities and experience discrimination. The impact of working part-time to care for children, which women do far more than men, can have a long term effect on careers. In my role I was fortunate to have a job plan on appointment that meant I am able to be actively involved in my daughter’s life, undertaking the school run and childcare requirements on specific days, and this does not appear to have negatively impacted my career.
Secondly, closing the gap benefits all doctors, men as well as women. Many more male trainees would undoubtedly like to take more paternity leave and reduce their hours when they have children or to pursue other interests. However, the system makes it hard to do so – the conditions which need to be met for shared parental leave are fairly stringent and many male doctors wanting to go less than full time still unfortunately face barriers. There are huge benefits to getting this right. Tackling the gender pay gap makes for a healthier, happier workforce, better patient care and increased organisational productivity.
The final reason I’m involved with the GPG review is because as men there is a lot we can do to get to champion the review and help increase the impact of its recommendations. So I am urging my colleagues to
At a time when medicine faces a huge recruitment and retention crisis we need to be acknowledging and fairly rewarding the contribution of all our doctors. Making it easier for doctors to work flexibly, increasing support for parents and offering a better work-life balance offer long term remedies. Sorting out the pay gap in medicine is not a win-lose game but a win-win.
Phil de Warren-Penny is a deputy co-chair for negotiations on the BMA consultants committee and member of the BMA’s internal advisory group on the gender pay gap
Find out more about the BMA’s work on the gender pay gap
Very informative post! That exactly what i was searching!
Impressive post. Thanks for sharing.
<a href=assignmentfirm.com>Help With Assignment</a>