If you continue without changing your settings, we’ll assume you’re happy to receive all cookies from the BMA website. Find out more about cookies
When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms.
You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
These cookies are required
These cookies allow us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information we collect is anonymous unless you actively provide personal information to us.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies allow a website to remember choices you make (such as your user name, language or the region you're in) and tailor the website to provide enhanced features and content for you.
For example, they can be used to remember certain log-in details, changes you've made to text size, font and other parts of pages that you can customise. They may also be used to provide services you've asked for such as watching a video or commenting on a blog. These cookies may be used to ensure that all our services and communications are relevant to you. The information these cookies collect cannot track your browsing activity on other websites.
Without these cookies, a website cannot remember choices you've previously made or personalise your browsing experience meaning you would have to reset these for every visit. In addition, some functionality may not be available if this category is switched off.
Our websites sometimes integrate with other companies’ sites. For example, we integrate with social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, to make it easier for you to share what you have read. These sites place their own cookies on your browser as a result of us including their icons and ‘like’ or ‘share’ buttons on our sites.
This week, public sector workers across England have voiced their frustration and anger at yet another round of disingenuous and derisory pay announcements from the UK Government. While we are still awaiting news on the pay awards from the devolved nation governments (see Peter Bennie’s excellent blog on Scottish proposals here), after years of broken promises and disappointments, the pay announcement for doctors in England is even worse than many predicted.
Since taking up his new role, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, has emphasised that the NHS workforce is an early priority, tweeting “I value you. I admire you. I will fight for you and I will champion you. #LoveNHS”.
Fine words perhaps, and a definite change in tone from the Government, but following Tuesday’s announcement, many will feel that these words were yet more empty promises. Actions speak louder than words, and in the face of years of pay freezes and below-inflation increases which have amounted to an almost 22% real terms pay cut for junior doctors, these apparent commitments to value the workforce will be seen as meaningless.
Tuesday’s announcement just serves to confirm that the DDRB (Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration) process is broken. In recent years, we have raised concerns regarding the independence of the review body, with government interference in the process putting undue pressure on the DDRB to accept government policies on pay caps in the public sector, not to mention the debacle over the DDRB’s risible recommendations for the junior doctor contract in 2015.
The recommendations made by the DDRB are yet again inadequate, but even these were in turn ignored by the government, with even more derisory proposals announced. We must be clear: a 2% increase on basic pay for junior doctors from October 2018 simply matches inflation. This is no pay ‘increase’.
The impacts of these ‘increases’ are widespread; as women on average undertake a greater amount of childcare, the below inflation pay rise, coupled with the rising costs of childcare (which conversely are well above inflation rates), may force many to reduce their hours to accommodate unpaid childcare. This is particularly galling at a time when the government has commissioned a review of the Gender Pay Gap in medicine. This could well exacerbate that gap.
In our evidence to the DDRB, we stressed that in light of the ongoing real terms pay cut, combined with significant increases in costs of living (including tuition fees, costs associated with training, examination costs and indemnity), living standards for junior doctors are deteriorating, and the attractiveness of medicine as a career choice is likewise decreasing. Increasing numbers of junior doctors are needing to take time out of their training due to concerns about their own wellbeing, with this year’s GMC National Training Survey showing that nearly 1 in 3 junior doctors report signs of burnout. A fair pay deal is part of a range of measures that must be taken to recruit and retain an adequate number of doctors into the workforce, not just when they finish medical school, but beyond in specialty training.
This Government announcement is completely contradictory to its claimed wider vision of ensuring safe and effective NHS care in the future. The junior doctor workforce is a fundamental part of ensuring that the right clinician is in the right place, at the right time, with the right skills. Junior doctors are also the senior medical practitioners of the future; if the Government ignore this group then patient care that will inevitably be impacted.
The Government’s claim that “this is a pay rise that recognises the value and dedication of hardworking Doctors and Dentists “shows a complete misunderstanding of the issue. Doctors spend their careers making the care of their patients their top priority, in what are increasingly overstretched difficult conditions; it is time that this Government made public sector workers, those dedicated to caring for others, their priority.
At the beginning of this round of the pay review process, the former Chair of BMA Council, Dr Mark Porter, wrote to the DDRB calling for them to exhibit the independence they were originally formed to provide.
Last month at our Annual Representatives Meeting, the Representative Body called on the BMA to “identify actions to reflect the feeling of the profession and support achieving a fair settlement for medical staff.” It is increasingly clear that the DDRB are unfit for purpose in identifying fair settlements for the health service. Originally created to offer independence, the fact, that their recommendations are also now ignored by government suggests that this intermediary is no longer fit for purpose and that direct negotiation with government is required to ensure that the profession is not ignored.
We are keen to discuss next steps with other unions whose members are equally frustrated by recent pay announcements and take stock of this dialogue when planning our response. Ultimately any final decisions on actions from the BMA will need to be taken by BMA Council.
Junior doctors, along with their colleagues across the profession and the public sector, have had enough of real terms pay cuts, spun to give the appearance of a positive step forwards. There will be an Association wide consultation and response to this, to demonstrate to Government the strength of feeling among members. However, it’s clearly time for the profession in England to withdraw completely from the DDRB process, and for the Secretary of State to commit meaningfully to addressing pay, recruitment and retention issues directly.
Jeeves Wijesuriya is chair of the BMA junior doctors committee.
What’s up it’s me, I am also visiting this site daily, this website is in fact pleasant and the viewers are in fact sharing good thoughts
Strike, strike, strike.
Your article is detailed, thanks to it I solved the problem I am entangled. I will regularly follow your writers and visit this site daily http://colorswitch2.com
Follow this link https://persuasivepapers.com/ to have a better understanding of the persuasive essay writing process.
Organise a strike, stickers obviously as well, then as it gains momentum alter the terms of the action, look disorganised and capitulate. https://www.9apps.red/